Pricing & incentives
Transparent pricing vs. performance-based attribution conflicts
When vendors are paid a percentage of “recovered revenue,” they control the attribution methodology that determines their own compensation. Natural recovery is common — cards get refilled, customers fix issues, holds resolve. Without transparent attribution, you can't distinguish vendor impact from natural recovery.
Churn Buster
- Usage-based pricing tied to your MRR — paid for software and expertise, not for claiming credit
- No financial incentive to inflate attribution or manipulate metrics
- Clear methodology distinguishing incremental lift from natural recovery
- Success measured by your overall improvement, not attribution disputes
- Month-to-month contracts — 90%+ retention through demonstrated value, not lock-in
Flycode
- Performance-based pricing (percentage of recovered revenue)
- Vendor controls the attribution methodology that determines their compensation
- Financial incentive to maximize attribution to their platform
- Payments data is extremely hard to audit independently